Landly
Cold emails that get replies
Generate an ATS-ready resume or get instant smart feedback.
Student Pro gets overall score + top 5 fixes.
Career Pro gets full breakdown, keyword analysis + professional tips.
Most resumes never reach a human. They get filtered out by software before a recruiter even opens them. If you're applying to mid-to-large companies and not hearing back, your resume probably isn't broken — it just isn't passing the machine.
Here's everything you need to know to fix that.
An Applicant Tracking System is software that companies use to collect, parse, and rank resumes automatically. When you apply online, your resume gets ingested by the ATS before anyone sees it. The system extracts your skills, job titles, education, and keywords — then scores you against the job description.
If your score is too low, you're out. No email, no rejection letter, nothing. The recruiter never knew you applied.
This isn't a bug — it's intentional. A company posting a senior engineering role at Google gets 10,000 applications. No recruiter team can read all of them. The ATS is the filter.
Tables and columns. They look clean in Word or Canva. The ATS sees scrambled garbage. Most parsers read left to right, top to bottom — a two-column layout confuses them completely. Your skills end up next to your job title, your dates disappear, your name gets lost. Use a single-column format. Always.
Headers and footers. A lot of resume templates put your name and contact info in the document header. Most ATS systems can't read document headers — they're treated as metadata, not content. Put your name and contact in the body of the document.
Graphics and icons. The skills section with little bar charts showing your "Python: 80%" proficiency looks nice. The ATS reads nothing. Images, icons, progress bars, and charts are completely invisible to parsers. Replace them with plain text skill lists.
Non-standard section headers. Don't call your experience section "Where I've Worked" or your education "My Academic Journey." ATS systems look for standard headers: Experience, Education, Skills, Projects. Anything unusual might not get parsed correctly.
Wrong file format. Unless the job specifically asks for Word, submit PDF. PDFs preserve formatting and are parsed consistently. A .docx file can render differently depending on the parser version.
ATS systems rank resumes by keyword match. If the job description says "REST APIs" and your resume says "built web services," you might score low even if you have the exact skill. The language has to match.
The fix is simple: read the job description carefully and mirror its language. If they say "cross-functional collaboration," use that phrase. If they list "TypeScript, React, Node.js" in requirements, make sure those exact strings appear in your resume if you have them.
This isn't keyword stuffing — it's translation. You're converting your experience into the language the ATS is trained to recognize.
For technical roles specifically, include both the full name and abbreviation where relevant. "Machine Learning (ML)" covers both variations. "Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment (CI/CD)" covers both. Don't assume the parser knows acronyms.
The ATS doesn't just check if keywords exist — modern systems also evaluate the quality and context of your experience. Weak bullets hurt your score.
The formula that works: [Action Verb] + [Specific Task] + [Quantified Result]
Bad: "Responsible for improving the backend."
Good: "Refactored authentication service, reducing average API response time by 40% for 2M+ daily active users."
The number doesn't have to be exact — it has to be credible. If you built a project with 500 users, say 500 users. If you reduced a build time from 10 minutes to 6, say you reduced it by 40%. Quantification signals seniority and makes your bullets scannable for both the ATS and the recruiter who eventually reads it.
Strong action verbs to use: Engineered, Architected, Deployed, Optimized, Automated, Shipped, Reduced, Increased, Built, Launched, Integrated, Scaled, Refactored, Designed, Implemented.
Weak verbs to eliminate: Helped, Worked on, Was responsible for, Assisted with, Participated in, Collaborated on.
Your skills section is one of the highest-weight sections for ATS scoring. Keep it clean and technical only.
Remove soft skills entirely. "Team player," "strong communicator," "leadership" — these do nothing for ATS scoring and signal to human reviewers that you're padding. Every candidate claims to be a team player. No recruiter has ever hired someone because their resume said "hard worker."
Organize by category if you have enough: Languages, Frameworks, Tools, Platforms, Databases. This structure is both ATS-friendly and easy for a recruiter to scan in 6 seconds.
If you're a student or have under 5 years of experience: one page. Non-negotiable.
Recruiters at top companies spend an average of 6-7 seconds on an initial resume review. A two-page resume from a junior candidate signals poor editing judgment. If you can't distill your experience to one page at 22, how will you write concise code documentation or product specs?
Cut your oldest or least relevant experience. Keep your most impressive projects. Every line should earn its place.
Before submitting to any company, run your resume through a checker. Look for keyword gaps against the specific job description, not just generic feedback. A resume optimized for a product manager role at a startup needs different keywords than one targeting a systems engineer role at a defense contractor.
Tailor your resume for each application category if not each individual role. It takes 10 minutes and meaningfully improves your match score.